By Robert Barnes*

When examining the nuclear capabilities of the United Kingdom and France, we find that the UK possesses 225 nuclear weapons, while France has 290. However, these numbers only scratch the surface of a complex and nuanced military strategy that reflects decades of geopolitical tensions and historical contexts.

Historical Context and Strategic Alliances

Historically, Britain and France have had their share of conflicts, but since the Congress of Vienna in 1815, they have maintained a notably close alliance. The presence of nuclear weapons in both countries is not a preparation for conflict with each other, but rather a response to broader strategic threats, primarily from the Soviet Union during the Cold War and its successor state, Russia.

The Cold War and the Soviet Threat

In the aftermath of World War II, the Western bloc, including the UK and France, perceived the Soviet Union as a significant threat. The Soviet military’s potential for rapid and overwhelming force across Europe necessitated a robust deterrent strategy. This led to the development of independent nuclear arsenals by both the UK and France, designed to counter a possible Soviet invasion that could swiftly reach the English Channel.

France’s Nuclear Posture: Force de Frappe

France’s nuclear strategy, known as the Force de Frappe (Strike Force), was developed to ensure the country’s autonomy in its defense, particularly in the scenario of NATO’s collapse or failure. This strategy emphasizes the ability to inflict unacceptable damage on any adversary, thereby deterring an invasion.

Components of France’s Nuclear Arsenal

1. Air-Based Delivery Systems:
   • France deploys Rafale BF3 fighter jets capable of delivering up to 50 nuclear warheads, each with a yield of 300 kilotons, to targets within a 2,000-mile radius.
   • Of these 50 warheads, 10 are stationed on the Charles de Gaulle, France’s sole operational aircraft carrier.
2. Submarine-Based Delivery Systems:
   • France operates four ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs) armed with M51.1 and M51.2 submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs).
   • The M51.1 has a range of 6,000 km, while the M51.2 can reach 9,000 km. Each SLBM carries 4 to 6 Multiple Independently Targetable Reentry Vehicles (MIRVs), each with a 100-kiloton warhead.

The UK’s Nuclear Deterrent: Trident and Vanguard Submarines

Similarly, the UK’s nuclear deterrent strategy is heavily reliant on submarine-based systems. This strategy underscores the UK’s preparation for a worst-case scenario where it becomes the last NATO stronghold in Europe.

Components of the UK’s Nuclear Arsenal

1. Submarine-Based Delivery Systems:
   • The UK’s nuclear arsenal is centered on four Vanguard-class SSBNs, each equipped with Trident II D5 missiles.
   • These missiles have a range of up to 10,000 km and can carry between 1 and 8 MIRVed warheads, each with a yield of 100 kilotons.

Letters of Last Resort

A unique aspect of the UK’s nuclear deterrent is the “letters of last resort.” These are handwritten letters by the sitting Prime Minister, stored in safes aboard each Vanguard submarine. The contents of these letters provide instructions to the submarine commanders if the UK’s command-and-control structures are destroyed in a nuclear attack. The instructions typically fall into one of four categories:

1. Retaliate against the enemy: Launch nuclear strikes on enemy cities.
2. Do not retaliate: Refrain from launching nuclear weapons.
3. Use your judgment: Allow the submarine captain to decide the course of action.
4. Surrender command to an allied country: Transfer control of the submarine and its arsenal to a trusted ally.

Conclusion: A Balanced Deterrent

The nuclear capabilities of the UK and France are significant, with each country maintaining a robust and independent deterrent force. While the numbers—225 for the UK and 290 for France—give a snapshot of their arsenals, the strategic doctrines behind these weapons are deeply rooted in historical alliances, perceived threats, and a commitment to deterrence.

Both nations have structured their nuclear forces to ensure that any adversary contemplating an attack would face catastrophic retaliation, thus maintaining a precarious peace in a world where nuclear proliferation remains a complex and critical issue.

---

*Robert Barnes, a retired British Army officer with over, including key leadership roles in NATO missions, now advises on defense strategy and modern military tactics.